So the researchers chose to test whether PITd contained any such neurons. They haphazardly chose around 200 neurons, trusting that at minimum some of them would end up being area explicit, reacting solely to one piece of the screen with moving specks that the monkeys in the trial were taking a gander at.
At the principal recording meeting, Freiwald paced anxiously on his feet, gazing at the screens that track the electrical movement of the neurons and play it in solid structure. Be that as it may, his nervousness before long went to mistrust. The outcomes were simply excessively great: The principal arbitrarily picked neuron showed a solid preference for a particular area. Thus did the subsequent neuron. And afterward the third. “It was totally staggering,” Freiwald says. “We sorted out that one of us could shut his eyes and tell just by paying attention to the neuron’s reaction whether the subject is focusing on the left or right piece of the screen. That is the way solid the sign was.”
The sign could even anticipate when the monkeys would commit an error since they weren’t focusing on the ideal place. Also as intently as these PITd neurons followed the locus of consideration, they disregarded what was really occurring on the screen—one more component of a consideration region. In contrast to a commonplace tactile neuron, their action continued as before regardless of whether the moving dabs altered course or shading.
Ultimately, the researchers animated PITd to misleadingly enact it. “We could work on the creature’s exhibition,” Freiwald says. “That for me is the key part in making a solid case that this region controls consideration.”